Umsebenzisi we-Intanethi usetshenziselwa ukukholelwa kwezengqondo. Okungenani ezingeni elijwayelekile kakhulu. Abaningi bethu, ngaphandle kokufiphaza ngeso, basebenzise imigomo - Gazlating, Stockholm syndrome, iwayini elinobuthi ... kodwa ulwazi oludumile luvame ukwenziwa lula ngaphambi kokulahleka kwezinye izici ezibaluleke kakhulu. Isazi sezengqondo uPavel Zyggmantovich sitshela ukuthi kwenzeka kanjani ngezigaba ezinhlanu zokwenza inkathazo.
Le nothi inikezelwe okuhlangenwe nakho kosizi futhi, mhlawumbe, ngilusizi. Lokho okuzwile ngezigaba zokuhlangenwe nakho kosizi, ukubeka ngobumnene, hhayi ekugcineni kuhambelana neqiniso.
Ngakho-ke ake siqale kusukela ekuqaleni. Abaningi lapho kubhalwe khona nge-Intanethi ukuthi, ebhekene nosizi (ukulahleka noma, ngokwesibonelo, imininingwane ngesifo esingenakuphucuko), umuntu uhlala njalo,
1. Ukuphikwa (lokhu kuyiphutha, lokhu akwenzekanga, empeleni konke akulungile) 2. Intukuthelo (konke lokhu kungenxa yakho, unecala ngenkathi ujabule lapha, nginosizi) .3. Ukuxoxisana (uma ngenza okuthile, khona-ke lesi simo sizothuthuka, udinga nje ukufunwa futhi ngokufanele "). Ukudana komoya (konke kubuhlungu, konke kubi, isimo sethemba) .5. Ukwamukelwa (angikwazi ukulungisa noma yini futhi ngiqonde ukuthi lokhu kunjalo, angizizwa ngimpofu futhi ngiyesabeka kulokhu)
Futhi abaningi kwabonakala sengathi kunjalo. Ngempela, ngoba kwenzeka kaningi ukuthi umuntu owayesethi, ngezindaba "unesifo esingelapheki," into yokuqala ayikholelwa kukho. Uthi, bathi, Udokotela uyiphutha, hlola futhi. Uya kwabanye odokotela, okukodwa kwenzeka kwesinye, ngethemba lokuzwa ukuthi uLekari wangaphambilini wawungaphutha. Ngemuva kwalokho, umuntu uqala ukuthukuthelisa odokotela, khona-ke efuna izindlela zokuphola ("ngangiqonda, ngangihlala kabi futhi ngoba ngigula") lapho kungabikho lutho olusebenzayo, futhi Lapho-ke ukudangala kudlula, umuntu uyafisa ngesimo sakhe futhi aqala ukuhlala esimweni samanje.
Kubukeka sengathi, iKübler-Ross ichaze konke kahle. Lokho lokhu nje, incazelo yayingukuhlangenwe nakho komuntu siqu, futhi akukho okunye. Isipiliyoni somuntu siqu singumsizi omubi kakhulu ocwaningweni.
Okwesibili, kunamanye wokuhlanekezelwa okuqondayo okungavumeli ukwenza isiphetho senhloso maqondana nokuthile ngesiphetho sabo somuntu siqu ngokuhlaselwa kwesipiliyoni. Ukuze ufeze inkimbinkimbi futhi uma imisebenzi engafuneki ocwaningweni lwayo.
UKübler-Ross awenzanga imisebenzi enjalo, umphumela weRosental akazange asuse futhi ngenxa yalokho athole uhlelo olubhekise kungokoqobo ngokwengxenye kuphela.
Ngempela, kwenzeka ukuthi umuntu agijime ngqo lezi zigaba ezinhlanu, futhi zilandelana kangaka. Futhi kwenzeka lokho ngqo. Futhi kwenzeka ukuthi ezinye zalezi zigaba kuphela ezidlula futhi ngokujwayelekile ekulandeni kahle kwesiphithiphithi.
By the way, isifundo se-Connectupitutic kufanele silethe omunye umcabango othokozisayo - Kungenzeka yini ukuthi ukhulume ngokuhlangenwe nakho kokuhlangenwe nakho, uma abantu bethole ukuthobeka kusukela ekuqaleni, ngaphandle kwezinye izigaba zeKübler-Ross? Mhlawumbe azikho izigaba, kepha izindlela zokuhlangenwe nakho, ezingaxhunyiwe komunye nomunye? Umbuzo ...
Kokunye ukutadisha kwaboniswa ukuthi, okokuqala, kunabantu abangayeki ukwesula ngokulahlekelwa. Futhi, okwesibili, ukuthi "izinga lokuthobeka" lincike, kubandakanya nemibuzo yoMcwaningi (Sawubona umphumela we-rosyentl).
Ngokuvamile, isipiliyoni sokulahleka kanye / noma usizi lungaqondakali kakhulu futhi kuncike kwinani elikhulu lezinto - kungazelelwe, izinga lobudlelwano, umongo ojwayelekile wamasiko nokunye okuningi, abaningi, nabaningi, abaningi, abaningi. Akunakwenzeka uma kwenzeka ukubeka konke kusikimu esisodwa. Ngokufanelekile, kungenzeka uma uza nesikhumba futhi uvikele ukuqinisekisa amasu okucwaninga.
Ngendlela, i-Kübler-Ross uqobo yabhala ukuthi izigaba zingaba se-oda lesiphithiphithi nakuzo, ngaphezu kwalokho, unganamathela esikhathini esingapheli .... Kepha lokhu kuphinde kusibuyisele embuzweni - Ngabe kukhona izigaba nhlobo? Mhlawumbe kunezinhlobo zosizi oluphilayo futhi empeleni azixhunyaniswa nohlelo kanye / noma ukulandelana?
Sizoxoxa ngombuzo onjalo - kungani uhlelo lweKübler-Ross, olungathandeki futhi alunangqondo, lwamukelwa kanjalo nombumbi? Ngingacabanga kuphela.
Ngokunokwenzeka, leli cala lisezingeni lokutholakala. Yini ama-heuristics wokutholakala (eng. Ukutholakala kwe-heorustic)? Le yinqubo yokuhlola lapho inkonzo yokunemba ingalandelwa khona wonke amaqiniso, kepha kube lula izinkumbulo. Engikukhumbule khona lapho kuyiqiniso. Isikimu seKübler-Ross senza kube lula ukukhumbula amacala empilweni yakho, kusuka kuma-movie, kusukela ezindabeni zabangane nabathandekayo. Ngakho-ke, kubonakala sengathi ilungile.
Ingabe kukhona inzuzo evela kuhlelo lwe-colub-ross? Yebo ikhona. Uma umuntu egunyaziwe ukusho ukuthi kuzoba kanjena, isimo sakhe kungenzeka (mhlawumbe!) Sithuthukisa. Incazelo, kwenzeka, kukhiqiza cishe umphumela wemilingo. Kunabantu abazolile lapho bazi ukuthi bangabalindile, kungakhathalekile ukuthi banjani noma abanempilo yokufika. Futhi, umuntu kulabo abashayisana nosizi may (mhlawumbe!) Bathole impumuzo uma wazi ukuthi kwenzekani kuye.
Ngakho-ke ungasebenzisa uhlelo empilweni yansuku zonke, kepha akudingekile ukuthandwa nokukhipha i-Universal One. Ukusuka kulokhu kungalimaza okungaphezu kokuhle.
Fingqa. Isikimu seKübler-Ross asisekho ukuqinisekiswa, sithathwe esimweni soMlobi, ubani, ngokwencazelo, asibandlululo. Lolu hlelo lungeyona indawo yonke, aluvumelekile kubo bonke abantu futhi kude nazo zonke izimo. Lolu hlelo lusetshenziswe okulinganiselwe, futhi kwesinye isikhathi uhlelo lungasetshenziswa. Lesi sikimu sinokulimala okusobala, futhi kungcono ukungayithandi uhlelo.
Futhi nginakho konke, ngiyabonga ngokunaka kwakho.
Umthombo: Phael Phael zyigmantovich ikhasi